Best Go Web Frameworks on GitHub

Short answer: choose Gin for a widely used, high-level framework; Echo for binding, middleware, rendering and centralized errors on top of net/http; Chi when you want a small composable router that keeps ordinary Go handlers; Fiber when Express-like ergonomics and its fasthttp engine fit your constraints; and Go 1.22+ net/http when standard-library routing is enough. Gorilla/mux remains historically important, but its repository was archived in 2023, so it needs a deliberate legacy or migration decision.

There is no universal winner. Frameworks, routers and the standard library solve different problems. Decide first how much framework API you want, whether handlers and middleware must remain portable, which conveniences you need, and what your own workload measures.

Quick comparison

Choice	Best fit	Main trade-off
Gin	Popular, high-level APIs and a large example ecosystem	Uses a Gin-specific context and APIs
Echo	Binding, middleware, rendering and centralized error handling	More framework surface than a small router
Chi	Composable routing with standard `http.Handler` compatibility	Fewer batteries-included features
Fiber	Express-inspired style and a fasthttp-based stack	Compatibility differs from `net/http`; review unsafe and library constraints
`net/http`	Few dependencies and ordinary Go handlers	You assemble conveniences yourself
Gorilla/mux	Maintaining an existing codebase	Repository archived in 2023; weak default for new projects
Beego	A broader framework option worth evaluating separately	Current maintenance and feature trade-offs require fresh checking

How to choose

Start with the standard library. Go 1.22 added method matching, wildcard path segments and Request.PathValue to http.ServeMux. Overlapping patterns are resolved by specificity, while conflicting registrations panic. These additions remove a dependency for many services. The Go team describes the routing changes here.
Use Gin or Echo for built-in application conventions. Pick Gin when adoption, examples and a concise high-level API matter. Pick Echo when binding, rendering and centralized error handling are central requirements.
Use Chi when portability matters. Chi is a router and middleware toolkit designed around standard handlers. It is not a batteries-included framework in the same sense as Gin or Echo. See the Chi repository.
Use Fiber only after checking compatibility. Fiber is Express-inspired but built on fasthttp, not the standard HTTP server stack. Its project warns that unsafe usage can affect compatibility with new Go releases. Review Fiber’s compatibility notes.
Treat popularity as a signal, not a verdict. A JetBrains survey reported Gin at 48%, Gorilla at 17%, Echo at 16%, Fiber at 11% and Beego at 4%. Respondents could select multiple choices, so these are reported usage shares, not market share or quality scores. Read the survey-based guide.

Go routing choices differ mainly in abstraction, compatibility and built-in conveniences.

Standard library: Go 1.22+ routing

For a small JSON service, net/http is often the clearest starting point. The following program uses method-aware patterns, a wildcard and PathValue.

package main

import (
    "encoding/json"
    "log"
    "net/http"
)

func main() {
    mux := http.NewServeMux()
    mux.HandleFunc("GET /healthz", func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
        w.Header().Set("Content-Type", "application/json")
        _ = json.NewEncoder(w).Encode(map[string]string{"status": "ok"})
    })
    mux.HandleFunc("GET /users/{id}", func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
        w.Header().Set("Content-Type", "application/json")
        _ = json.NewEncoder(w).Encode(map[string]string{"id": r.PathValue("id")})
    })
    log.Fatal(http.ListenAndServe(":8080", mux))
}

Run it with go run ., then request curl http://localhost:8080/users/42. Add timeouts, request-size limits, authentication and structured logging around the handler chain; the standard library does not choose those policies for you.

Gin

Gin provides a framework-specific context and concise route declarations. This complete example exposes JSON health and user endpoints.

package main

import (
    "net/http"
    "github.com/gin-gonic/gin"
)

func main() {
    r := gin.Default()
    r.GET("/healthz", func(c *gin.Context) {
        c.JSON(http.StatusOK, gin.H{"status": "ok"})
    })
    r.GET("/users/:id", func(c *gin.Context) {
        c.JSON(http.StatusOK, gin.H{"id": c.Param("id")})
    })
    _ = r.Run(":8080")
}

Use Gin when its context, middleware conventions and ecosystem reduce application code. Keep domain logic independent of *gin.Context when you may migrate later.

Echo

Echo is a net/http-based framework with binding, middleware, rendering and centralized error handling. The checked repository documents v5 as the current major line and lists v4 bug and security fixes through 2026-12-31; verify the support policy before starting a long-lived project. See Echo’s repository.

package main

import (
    "net/http"
    "github.com/labstack/echo/v5"
)

func main() {
    e := echo.New()
    e.GET("/healthz", func(c echo.Context) error {
        return c.JSON(http.StatusOK, map[string]string{"status": "ok"})
    })
    e.GET("/users/:id", func(c echo.Context) error {
        return c.JSON(http.StatusOK, map[string]string{"id": c.Param("id")})
    })
    e.Logger.Fatal(e.Start(":8080"))
}

Chi

Chi keeps the standard handler model, which makes it a strong choice for teams that want modular routers without committing every layer to a framework context.

package main

import (
    "encoding/json"
    "net/http"
    "github.com/go-chi/chi/v5"
)

func main() {
    r := chi.NewRouter()
    r.Get("/healthz", func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
        _ = json.NewEncoder(w).Encode(map[string]string{"status": "ok"})
    })
    r.Get("/users/{id}", func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
        _ = json.NewEncoder(w).Encode(map[string]string{"id": chi.URLParam(r, "id")})
    })
    http.ListenAndServe(":8080", r)
}

Fiber

Fiber’s API feels familiar to Express users, but handlers and middleware target fasthttp. Audit integrations that expect net/http, and read the project’s compatibility warnings before selecting it.

package main

import "github.com/gofiber/fiber/v2"

func main() {
    app := fiber.New()
    app.Get("/healthz", func(c *fiber.Ctx) error {
        return c.JSON(fiber.Map{"status": "ok"})
    })
    app.Get("/users/:id", func(c *fiber.Ctx) error {
        return c.JSON(fiber.Map{"id": c.Params("id")})
    })
    app.Listen(":8080")
}

Gorilla/mux and Beego

Gorilla/mux has substantial historical usage, but the project was archived in 2023 and reported use declined from 36% in 2020 to 17% in the cited 2025 JetBrains analysis. For new work, compare migration cost with Chi or net/http before adopting it. Beego appeared at 4% in the cited survey; evaluate its current release, maintenance and conventions directly before making a detailed commitment.

Performance and benchmarking

Do not rank frameworks from a single number. Measure your routes, serialization, middleware, database calls, payload sizes, Go version, hardware and concurrency settings.

A Gin project benchmark dated 15 March 2026 used a 203-route GitHub API workload on an Apple M4 Pro running macOS arm64, with Gin 1.12.0 and Go 1.25.8. It reported Gin 9,944 ns/op, Echo 11,072, Chi 94,376, Beego 101,941, Fiber 109,148 and GorillaMux 1,316,844. These are project-published results for that implementation and machine, not a universal ranking. The report also says Fiber’s fasthttp.RequestCtx reset overhead means its absolute value should not be compared directly with net/http routers; Fiber-versus-Fiber comparisons are the meaningful use of that figure. Read the benchmark methodology.

go test -run=^$ -bench=. -benchmem -count=5 ./...

Run representative end-to-end tests as well as microbenchmarks. A router that is slower in an empty benchmark may be irrelevant once database latency, TLS, templates and network transfer dominate.

Production checklist

Set server read, write and idle timeouts.
Limit request bodies before decoding JSON.
Return consistent error envelopes and avoid leaking stack traces.
Validate path, query and body values at the boundary.
Use graceful shutdown and drain in-flight requests.
Instrument latency, status codes, saturation and route-level errors.
Pin and review dependencies; recheck support policies before upgrades.
Load-test realistic payloads and downstream failures.

ScreenshotNeo removes common overlays before capturing the page.

Troubleshooting

Symptom	Likely cause	Fix
Route returns 404 after upgrading Go	Pattern syntax or method does not match	Check Go 1.22+ pattern rules, HTTP method and wildcard names; test the exact path.
Conflicting ServeMux registration panics	Two patterns overlap without a specificity winner	Make one pattern more specific or remove the duplicate.
Middleware cannot be reused	It depends on a framework context	Move shared logic to ordinary `http.Handler` middleware, or use an adapter.
Fiber library fails to compile or behave like net/http	Integration assumes standard request types or unsafe compatibility	Use Fiber-native middleware, adapters and versions supported by the project.
Requests hang during shutdown	No server context, timeout or graceful drain	Use `http.Server`, signal handling and `Shutdown` with a deadline.
Benchmark results vary widely	Different workload, CPU scaling, toolchain or concurrency	Pin conditions, repeat runs and report methodology beside every number.

Or skip the browser setup

If your Go service needs page images for previews, reports or documentation, ScreenshotNeo provides a single screenshot API call. It accepts the consent banner like a visitor and removes more than 60 known consent platforms, newsletter popups and chat widgets before capture. Bot checks, blank pages, timeouts, failed loads and cache hits are not billed, and response headers identify the page verdict and billing result. Its MCP server provides take_screenshot, get_page_info and capture_pdf tools for Claude, Cursor and other MCP clients.

See the ScreenshotNeo API docs for all options.

curl -G "https://api.screenshotneo.com/v1/shot" -d access_key=YOUR_API_KEY --data-urlencode url=https://stripe.com -o shot.webp

import requests
r = requests.get("https://api.screenshotneo.com/v1/shot", params={"access_key": "YOUR_API_KEY", "url": "https://stripe.com"}, timeout=90)
open("shot.webp", "wb").write(r.content)

const q = new URLSearchParams({ access_key: 'YOUR_API_KEY', url: 'https://stripe.com' });
const res = await fetch(`https://api.screenshotneo.com/v1/shot?${q}`);

You can also select an element, load lazy images for full-page captures, set a device or viewport, use dark mode and retina scale, inject CSS or JavaScript, click before capture, wait for a selector, delay or network idle, block requests, set headers, cookies, user agent, authorization, timezone or geolocation, create PDFs, resize images, cache with a chosen TTL, sign public image links, run asynchronous jobs with signed webhooks, capture up to 100 URLs per bulk call and query usage. Every plan includes every feature. The free plan includes 1,000 shots each month with no card; paid plans start at $5 for 3,000 shots.

Create a free ScreenshotNeo account and start with 1,000 screenshots per month at no charge.

FAQ

Is Gin a framework or a router?

Gin is a high-level web framework with its own context, middleware conventions and common HTTP helpers.

Should every new Go service use a framework?

No. Go 1.22+ net/http may cover routing needs with fewer dependencies. Choose a framework when its conventions and built-in features save more code than they add.

Does Chi replace net/http?

No. Chi composes standard handlers and middleware; it extends routing while preserving the standard model.

Can benchmark numbers decide the choice?

Only for a workload that matches your service. Report the complete method and validate with an end-to-end test.

Is Gorilla/mux still suitable for a new project?

Its archive status makes it a poor default for new work. Keep it when migration risk is higher, but document the decision and evaluate maintained alternatives.